Standards: sometimes good, sometimes bad

Standardisation Standardisation makes many administrative processes better. If people are submitting forms, it's easier to process those forms when they follow a standard design. If students want to find out the time and place of their lectures, they want that information in a standard way. Technology has a bias towards the pursuit of standardisation, partly… Continue reading Standards: sometimes good, sometimes bad

How to make self checkouts better, in 4 easy steps

Self checkout machines, once an amusing novelty, are now just another mundane fact of life. A harried clerk rushes between impatient, sighing customers. The customers put unexpected items in the bagging area. The machine sits stupidly, admonishing us, eating our money, spitting out change, and, in the meantime, taking our jobs. These machines obviously raise questions about human labour.… Continue reading How to make self checkouts better, in 4 easy steps

De facto standards for search engines, and why it doesn’t hurt to follow them

I wrote a while ago about dominant design, whereby one design becomes the standard way of doing things. In that post, I gave examples of play/stop/pause icons on media players, qwerty keyboards and traffic lights, though there are plenty of other examples out there. One thing I didn't mention was the distinction between these two:… Continue reading De facto standards for search engines, and why it doesn’t hurt to follow them

Learning from the Eames about information design

I happened across the (now defunct) website of Brooklyn-based designer Frank Chimero the other day. It's a nice site, pleasing to look at, easy to navigate and so on. But what interested me most was this, on the about page: "This site is an attempt to produce a contemporary personal website. I tried to avoid simplification and… Continue reading Learning from the Eames about information design